They have proposed to rescind the definition of harm that's been applied to the Endangered Species Act for over 40 years ... which appropriates a dinosaur as a logo and is listed as DINO on ...

Australia-based energy firm Woodside announced Monday plans to invest $17 billion in  a new liquefied natural gas export facility to ...

The opponents of salmon farming off northern Tasmania may not have had the numbers of their southern counterparts, but they had equally strong convictions as they gathered on Monday afternoon.Many of ...

With the demise of the Chevron, the Trump administration is now seeking to restore confidence in the scientific integrity of ...

Since it was passed by Congress and signed by President Nixon near the end of 1973 the Endangered Species Act served as the most powerful defense against natural resource exploitation that harmed ...

We are on the cusp of losing the integrity of one of the most significant environmental acts ever enacted in the United States. Why should this matter? As the Pulitzer Prize-winning evolutionary ...

It wouldn’t make much sense to prohibit people from shooting a threatened woodpecker while allowing its forest to be cut down ...

Changing the definition of “harm” in the Endangered Species Act would remove habitat modifications and imperil vulnerable species.

Wilson considered the Endangered Species Act of 1973 the most important piece of conservation legislation in our nation’s history. I know what that means. I know because I lived it. Fifty years ...

But that’s exactly what the Trump administration is proposing to do by changing how one word in the Endangered Species Act is interpreted: harm. For 50 years, the U.S. government has interpreted ...