That objection has it that Section Three, if interpreted too broadly, could be misused or abused by political partisans who apply it, as a tool to advance partisan political agendas. In some ways ...

It is an objection to complying with the Constitution – an argument for not following the Constitution, because of political hostility to what the document says and does.

After stating the Kalam cosmological argument and the two approaches to defending its first premise, I respond to two objections against the notion that an actual infinite collection is impossible: a ...

When another objection came moments later, Tacopina asked for the basis. "It's argumentative, it's repetitive, and it's inappropriate," Kaplan said. Tacopina started to reply, but Kaplan cut him off.