This is the battle that really makes Arjuna stand out as an archer and a warrior. Karna, though being a great archer, was clearly unable to upskill himself and learn advanced fighting skills like ...

Lyricist-poet Anantha Sriram criticised Prabhas' Kalki 2898 AD for depicting Karna as superior to Arjuna. He allegedly said that contemporary cinema was 'distorting Hindu mythology.

This made it impossible for Karna to be killed in battle or combat. As you know, by now, Karna was also known to be an extremely generous king, giving away anything that was asked of him by anyone who ...

Arjuna then again faces Karna, who by now has, presumably, recovered his strength. A brief battle ensues, the end of which is again Karna fleeing from the scene.

Karna Karna was a great warrior, in many ways greater than Arjuna. They may have been equal as archers, but physically, Karna was by far the stronger of the two.

Then BR Chopra called me up and said that I would also need to portray Brihannala, Arjuna's real form, which meant I had to shave off my moustache. I was like, 'No way, I can't do that.' ...

But while learning from the example of this fierce warrior and a generous ruler, we often question Krishna’s action of advising Arjuna to attack weaponless Karna as against the norms of the war.

Arjuna looked abashed in the battlefield on seeing guru Dhrona, the grandsire Bhishma and others. He hesitated to fight with them. Lord Krishna had to teach him and inspite of it he wavered. Karna ...